A brain with fake memories formed of particles in a randomly oriented system is more probable than a real brain. This is known as a Boltzmann brain.
Imagine that in this vast universe of ours, some brains have come into existence right this very second. Why brains? Because they’re enough for our consciousness and cognitive abilities—and that’s all one needs for the idea of their existence!
Everything in these brains formed right that second, and is false: the memories of life until that moment, their origin, their ideas, their perspective of the universe… they came with a ready-made set of memories and thoughts that never happened and are therefore artificial! These brains will perceive themselves to be real and everything they know to be real.
So, how would they know that these memories are artificial and their existence is more like a hallucination? How would we know that we aren’t these artificial brains called Boltzmann Brains?
Alpa, here is the Meme: https://imgflip.com/i/77ntq1
This is the Boltzmann Brain paradox, the result of Ludwig Boltzmann’s long years of debate with other scientists on his interpretation of entropy. The Second Law of Thermodynamics says that the entropy or disorder of a system can either stay the same or increase, but never decrease.
I mean, you’ve surely seen a glass shatter, but have you ever seen that shattered glass return to its previous pristine state?
This is what the Second Law revealed, that disorder must either stay the same or increase, but never decrease.
However, when Boltzmann applied his knowledge of statistical mechanics to the concept of entropy, it left scientists in heated debate for decades.
Recommended Video for you:
The Catch In The Concept Of Entropy
Boltzmann stated that the probability of the entropy of a system increasing or staying the same is high. However, that doesn’t mean the probability of the entropy decreasing is zero. It is simply so small that for realistic systems, like a box of particles, it can be ignored.
Let’s frame it another way. Imagine you are told that the probability of a ball turning blue from green is one in a trillion for a given box. Now, the box you are given only contains 10 balls, and you can only try 10 times. Technically, the probability of a ball changing from blue to green is negligible, right?
But what happens if you imagine an infinite system?
This question made the scientists at the time pause and take a step back; debate ensued.
The Buildup To The Paradox
Scientists realized that if the system has an infinite number of particles, there will be at least one instance or one possibility of those infinite possibilities that the particles would make something structured, instead of in some random orientation!
An example of this is an infinitely old universe. An infinitely old universe means an infinite number of possibilities where the entropy increases. Increased entropy, as we already know, equals increased randomness. However, as stated before, the seemingly impossible phenomenon of entropy reduction is still possible in an infinite phenomenon! So in an infinite universe, we have only ONE possibility out of an infinite number where the entropy reduces and the particles come together to form a structure, instead of randomly existing.
However, in a finite universe, there is no chance of infinite possibilities, so the idea of a structured universe or an alive universe is moot!
Boltzmann took this example of an infinitely old universe and ran with it. He said that at some point, all of the randomly organized particles in an infinitely old universe must come together to form a structured system. That is what statistics say! Maybe this formation of a structure would mean all these particles converging into one point—leading to the Big Bang!
Another possible idea he proposed was of a local system in an infinitely large system, meaning one universe containing structure and life in the infinite system of a dead multiverse. Why a dead multiverse? Because a dead multiverse has no structure, which is what high entropy in a universe suggests.
So, no structure means more entropy and more entropy is infinitely more likely than reversing entropy. And we know that in an infinite system, there is only one possibility of reducing entropy. So, of course, in the infinite system of a multiverse, all universes except one will be dead!
But why would we even need an entire universe? Boltzmann believed that a local system as small as a galaxy could be structured and undead in an otherwise dead universe!
Now this idea, which started with the concept of thermodynamics, had entered the bounds of astronomy. This was when Sir Arthur Edington, a very famous astronomer, physicist and mathematician of the time, entered the debate.
He took this crazy and exciting train of thought a step further. Or rather, he simplified it a step further. He said that we don’t even need a whole galaxy to validate the existence of structure in a dead universe. We just need one intelligent observer, like you and me!
I mean, let’s be honest! What do you think is more probable – all the particles in an infinite universe converging for a Big Bang, or a local group of particles coming together to form an intelligent observer?
This idea of intelligent observers was brought to the ultimate pinnacle by physicists and cosmologists, Albrecht and Sorbo, who said that we would only need the body part necessary for cognition and consciousness i.e., the brain. A brain randomly existing out of nowhere in a dead universe (high entropy universe) containing memories of an entire life. A life that never actually was and is as artificial as its thoughts. This idea was called the Boltzmann Brain.
Let’s try to understand it in this way. Every memory we have until this point—how we were born, our parents, notions of the solar system, going as far back as our idea of Big Bang itself—would be artificial if we are Boltzmann brains. These are brains that have no reality, but think they do.
Are You A Boltzmann Brain?
Can you believe that all this discussion about the universe and its origin was happening long before Einstein’s theory of general relativity?
Well, I suppose that’s more believable than the fact that you could be a Boltzmann Brain!
When scientists came to understand the legitimacy of this paradox, everyone believed that they could never be a Boltzmann brain. I mean, duh! I know my existence is not artificial. However, a Boltzmann brain would similarly not know that its memories and existence were artificial.
This thought lit a fire and an existential crisis in the community, so people started researching the probability of one being a Boltzmann brain.
They calculated that the possibility of the existence of a Boltzmann brain in an infinite universe is infinitely higher than the probability of a human brain! That means statistically, we are more likely to be surrounded by Boltzmann brains and ARE ourselves Boltzmann brains! whereas, it’s very unlikely that there is even a real brain somewhere!
So, are we even real? Is the author writing this article real? Or are you, the reader of this article, in fact a Boltzmann brain?
How To Break The Boltzmann Paradox?
Now that we’ve fallen into an existential crisis, let’s be real. There is no way of knowing if we are a Boltzmann brain or not, but an infinitely high probability says that we are!
However, here’s the catch! We have been talking about a Boltzmann brain only in the context of a universe that has existed for an infinite amount of time. Maybe the answer is in the fact that the universe hasn’t existed forever!
Scientists studied the cosmological models existing for infinity that support the existence of Boltzmann brains. They came to the conclusion that these models are very unstable and too self-undermining to be considered seriously. Thus, they must be rejected, alongside the existence of these Boltzmann brains.
So the paradox was broken, right? Well, kind of!
We now know that the model of an infinitely long-existing universe is a bust. We instead believe that our universe has existed for a finite period of time starting from the Big Bang.
But the question that has kept the scientists awake at night remains unanswered. What was there before the Big Bang? Nothing? Or a dead universe that led to all the particles coming together and causing a Big Bang, leading to a structured universe? Hmm… sounds a lot like the Boltzmann brain universe to me!