How Long Did It Take For Multicellular Life To Evolve From Unicellular Life?

Most experts agree that unicellular life arose 4.1-3.5 billion years ago, while the first complex form of multicellular life first formed around 600 million years ago. Generally, it is believed that unicellular life reigned supreme for more than 2 billion years before the evolution and spread of multicellularity.

Given how empty most of the universe appears to be, life is considered a rare and wondrous thing. At the time of this writing, Earth is the only planet in the known universe to support life. Our planet is about 4.54 billion years old, and experts believe it took about 500 million years for life to first form. While rudimentary multicellular life formed 3.5 billion years ago, in the form of cyanobacteria mats, truly complex multicellular life appears to have arisen less than 1 billion years ago.

Obviously, unicellular life is pretty successful, given its long-term domination of the planet, which raises some questions, namely why and how did unicellular life evolve into multicellular life?

Early Unicellular Life

Now, there is some debate about the first origins of life on the planet, with estimates ranging from 3.77 billion years to 4.5 billion years ago—less than fifty million years after our planet formed! While the timeline may not be exact, there is little debate that the first forms of life existed on hydrothermal vents deep in the oceans, as the earliest evidence of life comes from hydrothermal vent precipitates. These first forms of life were simple microorganisms, and may have appeared almost immediately after the formation of the oceans.

just giv me a pool meme

However, the first undisputed and direct evidence of life on Earth dates back to about 3.465 billion years ago—fossilized microorganisms—while earlier claims are typically dependent on the presence of substance involved in biochemical processes, though not remains of the organisms themselves. The early direct examples of life that have been found, however, already show some cellular complexity, including cell walls encasing the protein-generating DNA, so more rudimentary forms of life likely existed much earlier.

Unicellular Organisms, Amoeba, Paramecium, Euglena are single-celled organisms(Nasky)s

(Photo Credit : Nasky/Shutterstock)

Basically, beginning 3.5 billion years ago, single-celled organisms ruled—despite early multicellularity in cyanobacteria-like mats—most of which were prokaryotes, until the rise of eukaryotes (cells with a nucleus, organelles, and more complex functionality). Bacteria and Archaea are the first two domains of life that arose, followed by Eukarya. These simple organisms were able to maintain their individual metabolism and survive all on their own, requiring only one cell, rather than additional specialization. There are still many unicellular species on the planet, including bacteria, plankton and amoeba, as well as all protists (which are eukaryotes), and some fungi.

How Did Unicellular Life Advance?

As mentioned, cyanobacteria may have developed multicellularity quite early—3.5 billion years ago—but the earliest multicellular fungi examples are from 2.5 billion years ago, the oldest plant-like fossils date to about 1.6 billion years ago, the earliest animal fossils appear around 558 million years ago, and multicellular plants evolved from algae around 470 million years ago.

Red brown green algae seaweeds collection(Macrovector)s

(Photo Credit : Macrovector/Shutterstock)

The best guess by experts is that multicellularity has evolved 25 different times in eukaryotes, but complex multicellularity has only developed in six eukaryotic groups—animals, fungi, land plants, red algae, green algae and brown algae. The different ways that multicellular life developed, however, is an ongoing subject of debate, hinting at variable pathways throughout the history of life that allowed for greater complexity.

Unicellular organisms are essentially hermits, dependent only on themselves and their functional abilities to survive and reproduce, through fission, budding or mitosis. Multicellular organisms, however, give up their independence to become specialized, working in conjunction with cells performing different functions. Whether there are only a few dozen cells, as is the case of some algal species, to the more than 35 trillion cells in a human, the level of communication and symbiotic interaction between specialized cells seems far advanced from self-contained unicellular organisms.

what do you call a person

The initial leap into multicellularity, however, can be explained by the tendency towards the colonization of single-celled organisms. We see this in colonies of bacteria, mold and fungi all the time, single-celled organisms forming group clusters. These cellular clusters, in some cases, evolved their own traits and unique direction, often benefitting from the shared diffusion of resources, protection from predation or environmental threats. Over time, these clusters became accustomed to “group living”, and were no longer purely autonomous, relying on other parts of the group for survival and function.

In laboratory research, it has been shown that changing only a few genes in a unicellular organism can encourage simple undifferentiated multicellularity. This alteration could take a very simple form, such as a mutation that prevents cells from completely separating, resulting in a multicellular organism that can communicate, share resources and evolve greater specialization.

Why Did It Take So Long?

This “shift” between unicellular and multicellular seems quite simple and straightforward, which begs the question of whether the process is easily reversible, and why it took so long for more complex multicellular life to evolve.

In terms of that first question, whether the process is reversible, it’s hard to ignore the research pointing towards vacillation between unicellularity and multicellularity, depending on environmental conditions and the needs of the species. However, it has also been suggested that at a certain point, a cellular cluster will adapt permanently into multicellular living—a process called “ratcheting”—which would make it impossible (genetically speaking) to regress into a unicellular existence.

From this point onwards, evolution could only move in one direction—towards greater complexity. A good example of this would be the symbiosis of two cell types, each of which produces a compound that is essential for the other to survive. Once this relationship is established and “coded” into the genetic makeup of the cells, they will do better together than apart, so a return to unicellularity wouldn’t be selected for.

Recent research has revealed that many of the same genetic markers found in multicellular organisms—those responsible for critical protein synthesis and functions of complex creatures—are also found in some single-celled organisms. At first, this doesn’t make much sense, as these genes in complex eukaryotes are often responsible for functions that are unnecessary in single-celled organisms.

However, it is believed that over time and space, simple organisms used existing genes for new purposes, and found innovative ways to use pre-existing functions within the cell. Some unique function or structures present in a single-celled species may be found in two different specialized cell types of a multicellular organism, yet those early genetic markers remain.

Genetically speaking, this suggests that single-celled organisms simply have a less sophisticated mechanism in place for regulating gene coding. Single-celled organisms often boast complex genetic machinery that allows them to turn genes on or off, and we find similar transcription factors in our very own DNA!

To answer the question of why it took so long for complex multicellular life to evolve, we need to consider the environmental conditions for much of our planet’s history. The rise of eukaryotic life occurred around 2.5 billion years ago, preceding the considerable rise of oxygen levels on the planet (2.4-2 billion years ago). While there is some debate as to this massive influx of oxygen (commonly known as the Great Oxidation Event), most agree that the rise of photosynthetic eukaryotes that produced oxygen as a byproduct are primarily responsible.

you're welcome meme

This rise in oxygen concentration allowed for the flourishing of aerobic organisms, which also supported multicellular life and greater complexity. Earlier in Earth’s history, despite widespread unicellular life forms, these were largely anaerobic, including all of the Archaea domain, the earliest form of life. When the atmosphere shifted to an oxygen-rich one, anaerobic organisms were forced to retreat to anaerobic environments, while aerobic organisms (those using oxygen to make energy through cellular metabolism), and thus multicellular organisms, were free to spread across the planet. With the exception of three microscopic marine animals, all multicellular life is aerobic in nature.

A Final Word

Given all that we now know about the early history of unicellular life, and the mechanisms that enabled the leap to multicellular life, the incredible diversity of form and function that we see on Earth should come as no surprise. Every form of life on this planet arose from a universal common ancestor, billions of years ago, a single-celled organism with its own unique genetic code that could convert DNA to RNA to proteins. From such humble unicellular beginnings, the entirety of multicellular life on this planet evolved.

These incredible jumps from unicellular to multicellular didn’t happen only once, however, but dozens of times that can be traced back through genetic history. While the first achievement of simple undifferentiated multicellular life happened at least 3.5 billion years ago, complex multicellularity has evolved in the different eukaryotic kingdoms at very different rates. This should serve as a good reminder that evolution is not some static picture of the past, but a dynamic force that continues to this very day!

References

  1. ScienceDirect
  2. Royal Society Publishing
  3. ScienceMag (Link 1)
  4. ScienceMag (Link 2)
  5. Nasa.gov
The short URL of the present article is: http://sciabc.us/GxZB5
Help us make this article better

John Staughton is a traveling writer, editor, publisher and photographer who earned his English and Integrative Biology degrees from the University of Illinois. He is the co-founder of a literary journal, Sheriff Nottingham, and the Content Director for Stain’d Arts, an arts nonprofit based in Denver. On a perpetual journey towards the idea of home, he uses words to educate, inspire, uplift and evolve.

.
Science ABC YouTube Videos

  1. What is Quantum Entanglement: Explained in Simple WordsWhat is Quantum Entanglement: Explained in Simple Words
  2. Can We Harness Electricity From Lightning?Can We Harness Electricity From Lightning?
  3. Are Giant Insects Larger Than Humans Possible?Are Giant Insects Larger Than Humans Possible?
  4. What are Glial Cells: Definition, Types, Functions of Glial Cells | Role in PsychologyWhat are Glial Cells: Definition, Types, Functions of Glial Cells | Role in Psychology
  5. Why Don't They Have Parachutes For Passengers In Commercial Planes?Why Don't They Have Parachutes For Passengers In Commercial Planes?
  6. Methusaleh: The oldest tree in the world | What's the mystery of trees' immortality?Methusaleh: The oldest tree in the world | What's the mystery of trees' immortality?
  7. 7 Scientifically Inaccurate Things They Show in Movies: Most Common Movie Mistakes and Myths7 Scientifically Inaccurate Things They Show in Movies: Most Common Movie Mistakes and Myths
  8. Why Venus and Mercury have no Moons?Why Venus and Mercury have no Moons?