How Dangerous Is It To Iose A Nuclear Submarine At Sea?

Losing a nuclear submarine at sea poses a danger to aquatic life and to humans who are in the vicinity of the fuel leak, but it is not as big a threat as one would expect it to be because the nuclear material onboard is well-secured and water is a good absorber of radiation.

The second USS Thresher, a nuclear-powered attack submarine of the US Navy, sank in 1963 during deep-diving tests about 220 miles east of Boston, leading to more than one hundred casualties. Another nuclear submarine – the USS Scorpion – was lost at sea in 1968, resulting in the death of 99 crewmen.

uss scorpion

The USS Scorpion (SSN-589) (Photo Credit : Public domain/Wikimedia Commons)

K-8, K-27, K-219, K-159, K-278 Komsomolets… these are the names of some of the Russian nuclear-powered submarines that were lost at sea in the past few decades. All in all, humans have lost a total of nine nuclear submarines at sea since the Second World War.

Those ships were never recovered; all of them foundered due to some freak accident onboard or extensive damage that ultimately led to their destruction. Those fallen vessels now rest on the ocean floor.

But, interestingly enough, the world doesn’t seem to go crazy over the fact that those submarines were nuclear-powered, i.e., they carried small nuclear reactors onboard (to power them). Do you know why?

Why isn’t a nuclear submarine lost at sea considered as big a threat as one would expect it to be? Does the nuclear material onboard those submarines not pose a radiation problem, or some other serious risks to humans?

Mike class submarine

K-278 underway in 1986. It was a nuclear-powered attack submarine of the Soviet Navy that sunk in 1989. It’s currently resting on the floor of the Barents Sea, one mile deep, with its nuclear reactor and two nuclear warheads still on board. (Photo Credit : Public domain/Wikimedia Commons)

Let me start by answering the main question: a nuclear submarine buried thousands of feet below the surface of a sea doesn’t pose a serious threat to humans. Losing a nuclear submarine is, needless to say, not a situation that any navy would want to be in, but if it happens, the nuclear material onboard isn’t as serious a risk to humans as it would have been were it lost somewhere on land (or even in the air).

Now, let’s dive into some details of the whole thing:

Recommended Video for you:

If you wish to buy/license this video, please write to us at

Nuclear Reactors Are Well-secured Onboard

This one goes without saying, right?

Any vessel that’s powered by a nuclear reaction takes all possible precautions and deploys the best security measures to ensure that the reactor is adequately ‘secured’. This is done to make sure that the vessel’s crew is in no danger of radiation poisoning from the nuclear reaction that constantly powers the vessel.

Also Read: How Long Can Nuclear Reactors Run Without Human Interference?

Hence, even if a submarine founders, the chances of a tremendous and instantaneous leak of its nuclear material are very slim. However, the fuel would leak… eventually.

Water Is A Very Good Absorber Of Radiation

Remember the climax of Spider-Man 2, the superhero movie released in 2004? Doctor Octopus (the antagonist of the movie, who also happens to be a nuclear scientist) pulls a nuclear fusion reaction underwater to keep it from swelling more. He does this because he realizes that water will keep the reaction from spreading further.

still from spiderman 2 climax

A still from Spider-Man 2. Doctor Octopus is about to drown the nuclear reaction in the river to prevent it from swelling further. (Photo Credit: Spiderman 2, the movie/Marvel Studios)

I would not comment on other fictional aspects of the movie that aren’t so scientifically accurate, but this one was spot on! Water is indeed a good absorber of nuclear radiation.

Water acts a fantastic insulator against radiation, as it absorbs the neutrons released in a fission reaction. It acts sort of like a blanket that covers the nuclear reactor and prevents it from hurting anything/anyone in the vicinity. So, if you were to lose a nuclear submarine, seawater is your best and safest bet.

Even so, the fuel (which is rich in uranium) would eventually leak out in the seawater. How bad can that be?

Seawater Is Filled With Uranium… Naturally

Most people think of saltwater as just ‘water that tastes salty’. While that’s not incorrect, technically, what most people fail to realize is that seawater is loaded with a number of elements and salts.

Underwater sunbeams through the water surface viewed from the seabed on a reef of the Caribbean sea, natural scene ocean (Seaphotoart)(s)

World oceans are naturally packed with many elements. (Photo Credit : Seaphotoart / Shutterstock)

For instance, you might not know that seawater has a natural concentration of uranium (one of the primary elements required to make a nuclear weapon).

To be more specific, get this: the world’s oceans have no less than 4.5 billion tons of uranium dissolved in them already. 4.5 billion tons! That’s such a huge amount of dissolved uranium that if we could recover just half of that volume, it would support 6,500 years of our nuclear capacity.

great Scott

Also Read: Have We Solved The Problem Of Nuclear Waste Disposal?

Despite all this, losing a nuclear reactor underwater is not entirely harmless; it does harm aquatic life, especially in the immediate region where the fuel leaks. It could also harm humans if they are in the vicinity of the fuel leak.

All in all, losing a nuclear reactor at sea is obviously an extremely unfortunate event, but if we are strictly talking about the dangers it could pose to human life, the threat is reasonably contained at the bottom of the sea.

Share This Article

Suggested Reading

Was this article helpful?
Help us make this article better
Scientific discovery can be unexpected and full of chance surprises. Take your own here and learn something new and perhaps surprising!

Follow ScienceABC on Social Media:

About the Author

Ashish is a Science graduate (Bachelor of Science) from Punjabi University (India). He spearheads the content and editorial wing of ScienceABC and manages its official Youtube channel. He’s a Harry Potter fan and tries, in vain, to use spells and charms (Accio! [insert object name]) in real life to get things done. He totally gets why JRR Tolkien would create, from scratch, a language spoken by elves, and tries to bring the same passion in everything he does. A big admirer of Richard Feynman and Nikola Tesla, he obsesses over how thoroughly science dictates every aspect of life… in this universe, at least.