Why Did The Salem Witch Trials Happen?

Table of Contents (click to expand)

The Salem Witch Trials occurred because of an explosive combination of mass hysteria, religion and false accusations.

The infamous Salem Witch Trials started in 1692 in the Salem Village (now Danvers) of Massachusetts. They were manifestations of mass hysteria that induced false accusations and zealotry, leading to the unfair trials and sentencing of the accused as practitioners of witchcraft.

Recommended Video for you:

How Did The Trials Start?

There was considerable feuding involved in the start of these sham trials. Salem Village had two prominent families on opposing sides—the Putnams, Puritan landowners heavily involved in local politics, and the Porters, moderates with connections to the mercantile Salem Town. They somewhat saw each other as political and religious rivals.

The feud came to a head when a group of mostly young girls started exhibiting erratic behavior, including fits, convulsions, and screaming. The villagers believed that the girls were under the influence of witchcraft, and an investigation began. Among those doing the accusing were Thomas Putnam and his daughter Ann, while the accused included many members of the Porter family.

Those accused were often young girls, which contradicts the stereotypical image of witches. (Photo Credit : Pixabay)

Also Read: Why Did Waves Of Dancing Mania Sweep Across Europe During The Middle Ages?

Who Were The Accused?

Most of the people who were accused and convicted were women. This is possibly because New England was settled by Puritans, who believed that women were inherently sinful and easily influenced by the artifices of the Devil (harking back to the original sin of the Bible). Since the Puritan faith mandated that people fend off the Devil on a daily basis, this could have prompted them to report on anything out of the ordinary, assuming it to be the work of the Devil.

Thus, those who didn’t conform to Puritanical notions of behavior, especially women, (for example, fighting with neighbors or not being married or having children) might find themselves accused of witchcraft. Independent women (at least by 1692 standards) and those who had strong opinions were particularly vulnerable.

Another qualification was the wealth one possessed. Many of the people who were accused were also poor, and seen as burdensome for those who had to tolerate them in the society, as well as susceptible to underhandedness, in this case, the supernatural kind.

Those accused were already seen as Others or outsiders. (Photo Credit : Pixabay)

Those from marginalized communities, such as African Americans or Indigenous people living around Salem, were also found guilty by suspicion. Tituba, a slave from Barbados, for example, was accused of using ‘African magic’ or ‘voodoo’.

Also Read: Why Do Barristers And Judges Wear Wigs?

Why Did The Hysteria Begin?

There have been multiple attempts to explain the hysteria. One is the economic downturn experienced around that time (1500 CE to 1800 CE, give or take), called the ‘Little Ice Age’. Food shortages, colder temperatures and general deprivation in the United States and Europe may have caused people to fall back on superstitions that would allow some explanation for the unmerited time of hardship.

This may have led to scapegoating, blaming someone for one’s woes so as to avoid the more plausible, but less appeasing reason. Since witches had powers over natural phenomena, like the weather or crop growth, for example, they were ideal scapegoats.

A more Salem-specific theory uses the Salem Village agrarian economy’s juxtaposition with the mercantilism of Salem Town to explain why superstition took over the village. Anxieties of poorer neighbors may have made them turn to beliefs in witches and warlocks to placate themselves.

Witch in the Salem Witch Trials
The trials also represented local and general anxieties of those involved. (Photo Credit : Thomas Satterwhite Noble /Wikimedia Commons)

How Were The Trials Held?

The trials were presided over by William Stoughton, the colony’s lieutenant governor, along with seven judges. They were more often than not biased against the accused, who were forced to defend themselves without any counsel. Their oral testimony was countered by ‘spectral evidence,’ where the victims’ visions of attacks and the evil acts of the accused would sway the judgement in the former’s favor.

Those who did not accept their guilt were subjected to the harshest treatment by the law. Often, the accused confessed and then testified against and incriminated others, in order to get away with the charges and find leniency, based on the Puritanical belief that confessors would be punished directly by God.

The trials were already skewed in favor of the victims. (Photo Credit : picryl)

What Was The Aftermath Of The Trials?

The Salem Witch Trials left the community and people of Salem deeply scarred. Those who had been accused found it hard to return to normal day-to-day life and assimilate in a society of neighbors and friends who had so easily doubted their faith and character.

As a whole, people found it hard to return to a system where the rule of law had been so blatantly exploited, and due process had been so conveniently overlooked. The trust in law that keeps it functionally legitimate in society was betrayed. It would take a long time for that trust and stability to be restored.

Salem Witch Trials Memorial
The memory of the trials and its consequences is very potent. (Photo Credit : Christine Zenino/Wikimedia Commons)

A Final Word

The trials only came to an end when the Governor of colonial Massachusetts (whose own wife had been accused) intervened, concluding the very literal “witch hunt”. The accused were either released or pardoned. Public apologies by the judges and accusers were of little help to those who had already suffered, let alone those who had been killed.

By the end of the trials in May 1693, around fourteen women, five men, and two dogs had been executed (most were hanged, though one was pressed to death) for their alleged dabbling with the Devil.

References (click to expand)
  1. E Oster. (2004) Witchcraft, Weather and Economic - JSTOR. JSTOR
  2. Salem Witch Trials | The First Amendment Encyclopedia. Middle Tennessee State University
  3. AK Leventhal. Finding the True Cause of the Salem Witchcraft Trials. Western Michigan University
  4. DC Brown. (1993) The Forfeitures at Salem, 1692 - JSTOR. JSTOR
About the Author

Shreya Sethi is currently a law student at National Academy of Legal Studies & Research (NALSAR) University, Hyderabad. She likes to believe that she was born with a book in her hand and that she has subsequently only replaced it occasionally to suit her reading list. She also enjoys a good cup of tea as she watches a better sunset. She is passionate about history, arguably, the greatest story ever told

   -   Contact Us