No. The idea that the ship should have maintained its course and rammed into the iceberg head-on to minimize damages is far from plausible and is also scientifically inaccurate.
On the fateful day of 14 April 1912, the RMS Titanic, a luxury passenger ship described as “unsinkable,” collided with an iceberg, causing an accident of catastrophic proportions. Hundreds of lives were lost, accompanied by a massive loss of property.
After the accident, experts from all over the world examined the entire episode with surgical precision. Several hypotheses were put forward as to what could have been done to minimize the losses caused by the collision, one of which stated that if the Titanic had collided head-on with the iceberg, the damage to life and property would have been much less serious.
What if the Titanic hit the iceberg head-on?
In the aftermath of the accident, some people argued that if the ship had not tried to maneuver a turn at the last moment but had instead continued on its original course, fewer lives would have been lost.
As the ship had collision bulkheads in the bow, it would most likely have survived the damage. Moreover, the impact would have flooded the first three or at most four watertight compartments. As the Titanic was designed to remain underwater with four watertight compartments, such a catastrophic loss of life could have been avoided.
Those who agreed with this hypothesis blamed First Officer Murdoch for his irresponsible actions that led to the disaster.
Why did the Titanic hit the iceberg sideways instead of head-on?
The Titanic, a 55,000-tonne ship, was traveling at 22 knots, almost 41 km / h. They were trying to steer the ship to the left to avoid a direct collision, but the collision occurred, and the iceberg scraped along the side of the ship and tore its hull apart.
Here is a video showing how the collision actually happened:
3 Problems With a Head-on Collision
Bulkheads: Not as effective against an iceberg
The collision bulkheads on the bow of the Titanic were designed to survive a collision with another ship, but not an iceberg! They were erected as a precaution against such an event as happened to the RMS Republic in 1909.
The compartments of such bulkheads were more or less like the ‘crumple zones’ of modern vehicles, meaning that they absorbed most of the energy of the impact following a collision. The same thing would happen with the other ship (that collided with yours), as it also absorbed some of the energy of the impact. In such a case, both the vessels would sustain heavy damages but would likely still stay afloat.
If the Titanic were to collide with the iceberg – a stationary, mammoth object – most of the energy of the impact would have to be absorbed by the ship, which would have only made matters worse.
Abrupt Halt: Utterly Undesirable!
If the Titanic had rammed head-on into the iceberg, it would have come to a halt almost immediately; just think of what it feels like when you see a car swerving in front of you, and you suddenly step on the brakes.
An abrupt stop would have thrown people against cabins or berths, and since it was night and most passengers were asleep, they would have had absolutely no chance of bracing against the impact; they would have been flung into the things in their immediate vicinity.
In addition, the condition of the workers at the front of the ship would have been even worse.
In the event of a frontal collision, the impact would have extended the entire length of the ship, splitting seams and bursting rivets, in which case many more of the ship’s compartments would have been exposed to the sea, causing the ship to sink much faster.
The idea that the ship would have survived if it had crashed head-on into the iceberg is therefore crazy; there are several claims and hypotheses that suggest a variety of approaches that could have reduced, if not completely avoided, the severity of the tragic wreck of the RMS Titanic. Still, it is definitely not one of them.